How does Sidney defend poetry in an apology for poetry?
Philip Sidney defends poetry in his essay “An Apology for Poetry” from the accusations made by Stephen Gosson in his “School of Abuse” dedicated to him. There, Gosson makes some objections against poetry. Sidney replies to the objections made by Gosson very emphatically, defending poetry in his essay.
How is Sidney defense poetry?
Sidney states that poets are in control of themselves, they are not restricted by outwardly ideas. This sense of individualism was a popular tendency in Renaissance Humanism. Through these main points, it is clear that The Defense of Poesy is written with Humanistic values and ideals.
What arguments did Sidney put forward in his Defence of poetry?
In the “Defense,” Sidney argues that poets were the first philosophers, that they first brought learning to humanity, and that they have the power to conceive new worlds of being and to populate them with new creatures.
What are the three kinds of poetry according to Sidney?
The three kinds of poetry, according to Sidney , are : (a) religious poetry, (b) philosophical poetry, and (c) poetry as an imaginative treatment of life and nature. He calls special attention to the third class of poets, for ‘these be they that, as the first and most noble sort may justly be termed vates.
Why did Sidney write an apology for poetry?
Sidney’s reverence for the poet as soldier is significant because he himself was a soldier at one time. Poetry, in Apology, becomes an art that requires the noble stirring of courage. Sidney writes An Apology for Poetry in the form of a judicial oration for the defense, and thus it is like a trial in structure.
How does Shelley define poetry?
Shelley defines poetry as the mind at work through the power of analytical imagination upon thoughts produced by the faculty of synthesizing reason. Reason “enumerates” the “qualities” of the objects of thought while imagination perceives the relationships and value of those objects of thought.
What are the four charges against poetry?
Reply to four charges Stephen Gosson in his School of Abuse, leveled four charges against poetry. They were : (i) A man could employ his time more usefully than in poetry, (ii) It is the ‘mother of lies’, (iii) It is immoral and ‘the nurse of abuse’ and (iv) Plato had rightly banished poets from his ideal commonwealth.
Who said poetry is the mother of lies?
What does Sidney called poet haters?
Also, what does Philip Sidney call poet haters? … The ancient Romans paid high reverence to the poet by calling him Vates, which means a Diviner, a Prophet, or a Foreseer. Hence the Greeks honour the poet as a maker or creator.
What does the Roman word Vates mean in an apology for poetry?
The Prophetic Character of Poetry
The ancient Romans paid high reverence to the poet by calling him Vates, which means a Diviner, a Prophet, or a Foreseer. The etymological origin of Greek word ‘poet’ is Poiein, and this means ‘to make’. Hence the Greeks honour the poet as a maker or creator.
What is the purpose of poetry according to Sidney?
According to Sidney, Poetry teaches and delights; but that is not all. Sidney also points out the power of poetry to move the mind and to stir the heart. It is by its power to move the minds it influences the behaviour and conduct.
What is the Sir Philip Sidney’s views about poetry?
He states that poetry “is an art of imitation, for so Aristotle termeth it in his word mimesis, that is to say, a representing, counterfeiting, or figuring forth: to speak metaphorically, a speaking picture: with this end, to teach and delight” (223).
What are the three types of poetry?
Later aestheticians identified three major genres: epic poetry, lyric poetry, and dramatic poetry, treating comedy and tragedy as subgenres of dramatic poetry.
Why is Shakespeare called the poet of nature?
Shakespeare is a poet of nature also because his characters are natural; they act and behave think and speak like human beings. His characters are the faithful representations of humanity. He deals with passions and principles which are common to humanity. … They are above all human beings.