What kind of poem is the man he killed?
The poem’s form is a dramatic monologue in the voice of a returned soldier. There are five stanzas with four lines, following a regular metre and an ABAB rhyme scheme in each stanza. The first, second and last line of each verse is about six syllables long. and the third line is a little longer with eight syllables.
Which best describes the significance of the structure of the poem the man he killed?
Answer: The correct option is D) The poem has a rhyme scheme that creates a lighthearted tone, which contrasts with the subject of war and violence. Explanation: The poem ‘ The Man He Killed‘ depicts the scene of two men at the battlefield.
Who is the speaker in the poem the man he killed?
The speaker in “The Man He Killed” is someone who has listened to the soldier tell his story, rather than the soldier himself. Thus, the “He” in the title.
What is the purpose of the title of the poem The Man He Killed being in the third person and the poem in the first person?
Answer: Calling the poem “The Man He Killed,” reminds us that we’re eavesdropping on a dramatic moment—not snooping on the thoughts and feelings inside a speaker’s mind. Explanation: This poem begins with the hypothetical that the speaker and a man meet up in “some old ancient inn”.
How is conflict presented in the man he killed?
The speaker begins by conjecturing about other circumstances the eponymous man and he might have met under. He claims that if he had met him in an inn then they would have drunk together. Instead, he reveals that during the war they both shot at each other, a conflict which ended with the speaker killing the man.
How did O’Brien kill the man?
Summary. “The Man I Killed” begins with a list of physical attributes and possible characteristics of the man whom O’Brien killed with a grenade in My Khe. O’Brien describes the wounds that he inflicted. The man’s jaw was in his throat, he says, and his upper lip and teeth were missing.
What is the definition for poetry?
Poetry, literature that evokes a concentrated imaginative awareness of experience or a specific emotional response through language chosen and arranged for its meaning, sound, and rhythm.
Can the redundancy of old ancient 2 be poetically justified?
2. The repetition of because in the poem serves as a reassurance that the man has to make for himself. Old ancient can be poetically justified in that the man believed that if he had maybe met the other before he wouldn’t have killed him.
What are the two realities presented in the poem the man he killed?
It’s also notable how the last stanza rhymes “war is” with “bar is.” This means the poem ends by neatly reminding the reader of the two scenarios presented by the poem: the reality, in which the other man is dead (“war”), and the imaginary, in which the two men share a drink together (“bar”).
Why did Hardy write the man he killed?
Thomas Hardy wrote poems such as ‘The Man He Killed‘ as a way to express his feelings about the Boer wars which were going on during his time.
What does sat us down to wet mean?
“We should have sat us down to wet Right many a nipperkin!” this line suggests that the shooter felt bad for killing the dead man saying that they ‘should’ have sat down to many nipper kin’s (drink) and he feels the man’s life was wasted.
What does ranged as infantry mean?
It turns out that the speaker and the other guy were enemies in a war. And when they were “ranged as infantry,” or lined up in ranks for battle, they could totally look right at each other.
Why does the poet think that war is quaint and curious?
The speaker tries to justify the killing but can produce no stronger reason than that the dead man was his “foe.” Once he states this reason, he again thinks of the similarities between himself and the dead man, and then he concludes that warfare is “quaint and curious” (line 17) because it forces a man to kill another
How Thomas Hardy describes about futility of the war in the man he killed?
By reducing warfare to ordinary people who might otherwise be friends killing each other, Hardy shows how senseless war is. His narrator calls warfare “quaint and curious,” which is ironic: what he describes in killing an otherwise innocent person makes warfare appear barbaric and cruel.